NUFMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.

Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nufarm has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe Nufarm is more attractive than Fertoz.

Nufarm has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.613%.

Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.86x while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.40x versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.

Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nufarm has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe Nufarm is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.

Nufarm has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.86x while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.40x versus 4.89x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.46%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Nufarm, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Nufarm.

Nufarm has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.86x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.40x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Danakali's return on equity of --.

Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nufarm has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe Nufarm is more attractive than Danakali.

Nufarm has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.

Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Danakali offers a yield of 165.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.86x while Danakali's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.40x versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.