EHVVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -9.14%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.83%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 1.13x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -6.7%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.65%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 1.19x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -938.01%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could grow by 69.63%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 53.83x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Versus Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -13746.13%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Versus Systems's return on equity of -275.9%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Versus Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -18.79%. Given that Versus Systems has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Versus Systems is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Versus Systems has a beta of 1.728, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.804%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Versus Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Versus Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Versus Systems quarterly revenues of $3.9K. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Versus Systems's net income of -$529K. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Versus Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 67.37x for Versus Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.