DLICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 29.31%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.01%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.57%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.469%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.2B, which are larger than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $867.6M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.35x versus 2.70x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 38.98%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.67%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.074%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.2B, which are larger than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $12.1B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $867.6M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.35x versus 3.19x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 22.58%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.59%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.97%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.2B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $867.6M is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 9.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.35x versus 1.65x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 31.35%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.617%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.2B, which are larger than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $867.6M is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.35x versus 3.03x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.