Financhill
Buy
62

CILJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.88
Seasonality move :
-3.98%
Day range:
$1.88 - $1.89
52-week range:
$1.05 - $2.64
Dividend yield:
4.7%
P/E ratio:
4.34x
P/S ratio:
0.39x
P/B ratio:
0.66x
Volume:
8.5K
Avg. volume:
9.4K
1-year change:
52.85%
Market cap:
$53.1B
Revenue:
$117.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.43

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CILJF
China Life Insurance
-- -- -- -- --
AIFU
AIX
-- -- -- -- --
HPH
Highest Performances Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
NCTY
The9
-- -- -- -- --
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding
$73.2M $0.13 5.17% 44.44% --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CILJF
China Life Insurance
$1.88 -- $53.1B 4.34x $0.03 4.7% 0.39x
AIFU
AIX
$1.07 -- $60.7M 4.77x $0.00 0% 0.16x
HPH
Highest Performances Holdings
$0.32 -- $78.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.30x
NCTY
The9
$15.25 -- $137.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.03x
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding
$7.37 -- $1.4B 40.94x $0.00 0% 3.53x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CILJF
China Life Insurance
7.76% -0.707 11.87% 10.51x
AIFU
AIX
-- 2.533 -- --
HPH
Highest Performances Holdings
7.11% 5.559 0.73% 2.67x
NCTY
The9
-- 2.647 -- --
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding
22.81% -0.576 18.73% 0.67x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CILJF
China Life Insurance
-- -- 16.4% 17.51% 98.89% --
AIFU
AIX
-- -- -- -- -- --
HPH
Highest Performances Holdings
-- -- -13.89% -14.5% -- --
NCTY
The9
-- -- -- -- -- --
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding
$68.8M $41.7M 4.64% 6.09% 36.15% $153.8M

China Life Insurance vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CILJF or AIFU?

    AIX has a net margin of 34.89% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of --. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 17.51% beat AIX's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    -- $0.33 $89.2B
    AIFU
    AIX
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CILJF or AIFU?

    China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AIX has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 460.75%. Given that AIX has higher upside potential than China Life Insurance, analysts believe AIX is more attractive than China Life Insurance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0 0 0
    AIFU
    AIX
    0 0 0
  • Is CILJF or AIFU More Risky?

    China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.344, which suggesting that the stock is 65.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AIX has a beta of -0.052, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.186%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or AIFU?

    China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. AIX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 105.11% of its earnings as a dividend. AIX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or AIFU?

    China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than AIX quarterly revenues of --. China Life Insurance's net income of $9.3B is higher than AIX's net income of --. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.34x while AIX's PE ratio is 4.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 0.39x versus 0.16x for AIX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0.39x 4.34x $26.5B $9.3B
    AIFU
    AIX
    0.16x 4.77x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CILJF or HPH?

    Highest Performances Holdings has a net margin of 34.89% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of --. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 17.51% beat Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    -- $0.33 $89.2B
    HPH
    Highest Performances Holdings
    -- -- $376.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About CILJF or HPH?

    China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highest Performances Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Life Insurance has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe China Life Insurance is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0 0 0
    HPH
    Highest Performances Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CILJF or HPH More Risky?

    China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.344, which suggesting that the stock is 65.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.768%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or HPH?

    China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Highest Performances Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 105.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Highest Performances Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or HPH?

    China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Life Insurance's net income of $9.3B is higher than Highest Performances Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.34x while Highest Performances Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 0.39x versus 0.30x for Highest Performances Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0.39x 4.34x $26.5B $9.3B
    HPH
    Highest Performances Holdings
    0.30x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CILJF or NCTY?

    The9 has a net margin of 34.89% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of --. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 17.51% beat The9's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    -- $0.33 $89.2B
    NCTY
    The9
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CILJF or NCTY?

    China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Life Insurance has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe China Life Insurance is more attractive than The9.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0 0 0
    NCTY
    The9
    0 0 0
  • Is CILJF or NCTY More Risky?

    China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.344, which suggesting that the stock is 65.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.136%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or NCTY?

    China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 105.11% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or NCTY?

    China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. China Life Insurance's net income of $9.3B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.34x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 0.39x versus 0.03x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0.39x 4.34x $26.5B $9.3B
    NCTY
    The9
    0.03x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CILJF or TIGR?

    UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 34.89% compared to China Life Insurance's net margin of 17.57%. China Life Insurance's return on equity of 17.51% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    -- $0.33 $89.2B
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding
    68.05% $0.11 $703.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About CILJF or TIGR?

    China Life Insurance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.24%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than China Life Insurance, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than China Life Insurance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0 0 0
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is CILJF or TIGR More Risky?

    China Life Insurance has a beta of 0.344, which suggesting that the stock is 65.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.923%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CILJF or TIGR?

    China Life Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Life Insurance pays 105.11% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CILJF or TIGR?

    China Life Insurance quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. China Life Insurance's net income of $9.3B is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, China Life Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.34x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 40.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Life Insurance is 0.39x versus 3.53x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CILJF
    China Life Insurance
    0.39x 4.34x $26.5B $9.3B
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding
    3.53x 40.94x $101.1M $17.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?

Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?

Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25

Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.

Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.

Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock