Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
18
AUMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.09
Seasonality move
:
16.7%
Day range:
$0.08 - $0.10
52-week range:
$0.08 - $0.79
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.11x
P/B ratio:
14.43x
Volume:
118.7K
Avg. volume:
269.9K
1-year change:
-81.27%
Market cap:
$1.4M
Revenue:
$12M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.59
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$553.1M | $0.30 | 2.56% | 20% | $24.33 |
|
DYNR
DynaResource
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -- | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals
|
$0.09 | -- | $1.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$18.33 | $24.33 | $1.7B | 6.13x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.83x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource
|
$1.00 | -- | $29.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.61x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$16.47 | -- | $114.7M | 14.45x | $0.04 | 0.85% | 0.25x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
$0.34 | -- | $22.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
$0.61 | -- | $49.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals
|
-- | -4.498 | -- | -- |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
42.69% | 1.492 | 32.77% | 0.50x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource
|
76.8% | 1.860 | 42.06% | 0.26x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
21.78% | 0.899 | 32.37% | 1.16x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | 0.136 | -- | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -1.475 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals
|
-$7K | -$582K | -- | -- | -- | -$776K |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$81.8M | $63.8M | 32.07% | 63.58% | 10.43% | -$2.4M |
|
DYNR
DynaResource
|
$5.8M | -$623.5K | -87.62% | -197.22% | -3.58% | -$4.3M |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$10.1M | -$2K | 4.68% | 6.32% | -0.03% | $8.9M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-$166.6K | -$1.4M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.2M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-$8K | -$2.5M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.8M |
Golden Minerals vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or CENX?
Century Aluminum has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of 8.77%. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals-- $0.01 -- CENXCentury Aluminum15.17% $0.46 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1511.17%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.75%. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Century Aluminum.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals0 0 0 CENXCentury Aluminum2 1 0 -
Is AUMN or CENX More Risky?
Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.162, which suggesting that the stock is 83.824% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.576%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Golden Minerals's net income of $199K is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.11x versus 0.83x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals0.11x -- -- $199K CENXCentury Aluminum0.83x 6.13x $539.1M $47.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or DYNR?
DynaResource has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of -7.77%. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -- beat DynaResource's return on equity of -197.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals-- $0.01 -- DYNRDynaResource52.18% -$0.04 $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1511.17%. On the other hand DynaResource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than DynaResource.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals0 0 0 DYNRDynaResource0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or DYNR More Risky?
Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.162, which suggesting that the stock is 83.824% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource has a beta of 0.143, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.676%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DynaResource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DynaResource quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Golden Minerals's net income of $199K is higher than DynaResource's net income of -$870.5K. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DynaResource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.11x versus 0.61x for DynaResource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals0.11x -- -- $199K DYNRDynaResource0.61x -- $11.2M -$870.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or FRD?
Friedman Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of -0.63%. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals-- $0.01 -- FRDFriedman Industries9.5% -$0.10 $164.6M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or FRD?
Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1511.17%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Friedman Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals0 0 0 FRDFriedman Industries0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or FRD More Risky?
Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.162, which suggesting that the stock is 83.824% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or FRD?
Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or FRD?
Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Golden Minerals's net income of $199K is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.11x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals0.11x -- -- $199K FRDFriedman Industries0.25x 14.45x $106.8M -$675K
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of --. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals-- $0.01 -- PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -$0.02 -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1511.17%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 250.78%. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals0 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or PZG More Risky?
Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.162, which suggesting that the stock is 83.824% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals's net income of $199K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.11x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals0.11x -- -- $199K PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or XPL?
Solitario Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of --. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals-- $0.01 -- XPLSolitario Resources-- -$0.03 -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1511.17%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 145.9%. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Solitario Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals0 0 0 XPLSolitario Resources0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or XPL More Risky?
Golden Minerals has a beta of 0.162, which suggesting that the stock is 83.824% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals's net income of $199K is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.11x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals0.11x -- -- $199K XPLSolitario Resources-- -- -- -$2.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
