Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Buy
80
ACGBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.22
Seasonality move
:
3.31%
Day range:
$14.09 - $14.48
52-week range:
$9.02 - $14.48
Dividend yield:
11.12%
P/E ratio:
5.58x
P/S ratio:
2.20x
P/B ratio:
0.48x
Volume:
18.4K
Avg. volume:
17K
1-year change:
51.55%
Market cap:
$198.8B
Revenue:
$98.2B
EPS (TTM):
$2.54
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$422M | $1.25 | 39.61% | 74.83% | $83.90 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
$14.20 | -- | $198.8B | 5.58x | $0.81 | 11.12% | 2.20x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$87.00 | $83.90 | $12B | 21.35x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.24x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$0.99 | -- | $38M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.05x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$0.47 | -- | $9.5M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.82x |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
$1.54 | -- | $14.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.39 | -- | $51.5M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.23x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
50.05% | -0.411 | 247.22% | 48.87x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
12.53% | -0.881 | 3.97% | 0.64x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | 0.983 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 1.321 | -- | 56.19x |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
-- | 2.610 | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.325 | -- | 3.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
|
-- | -- | 4.8% | 9.32% | 147.3% | $219.8B |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$360.4M | $222M | 14.51% | 17.23% | 50.39% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
Agricultural Bank of China vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of 38.45%. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.66 $858.5B FUTUFutu Holdings81.81% $1.21 $4.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $83.90 which suggests that it could grow by 34.72%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Agricultural Bank of China, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Agricultural Bank of China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings12 2 0 -
Is ACGBY or FUTU More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.28%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.12%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $440.5M. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 21.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.20x versus 8.24x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.20x 5.58x $24.2B $11B FUTUFutu Holdings8.24x 21.35x $440.5M $169.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.66 $858.5B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or MATH More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.528%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.12%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.20x versus 2.05x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.20x 5.58x $24.2B $11B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.66 $858.5B MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or MEGL More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.12%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -326.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.20x versus 4.82x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.20x 5.58x $24.2B $11B MEGLMagic Empire Global4.82x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or PWM?
Prestige Wealth has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Prestige Wealth's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.66 $858.5B PWMPrestige Wealth-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or PWM?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prestige Wealth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Prestige Wealth, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Prestige Wealth.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 PWMPrestige Wealth0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or PWM More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Wealth has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or PWM?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.12%. Prestige Wealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Wealth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or PWM?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Prestige Wealth quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Prestige Wealth's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Prestige Wealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.20x versus -- for Prestige Wealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.20x 5.58x $24.2B $11B PWMPrestige Wealth-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBY or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.66 $858.5B TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBY or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is ACGBY or TOP More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBY or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.12%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBY or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.20x versus 6.23x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBYAgricultural Bank of China2.20x 5.58x $24.2B $11B TOPTOP Financial Group6.23x 61.61x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
