Financhill
Buy
86

ACGBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.54
Seasonality move :
6.8%
Day range:
$0.56 - $0.56
52-week range:
$0.36 - $0.58
Dividend yield:
8.69%
P/E ratio:
5.50x
P/S ratio:
2.17x
P/B ratio:
0.47x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
11.4K
1-year change:
55.56%
Market cap:
$196B
Revenue:
$98.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.10

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
-- -- -- -- --
FUTU
Futu Holdings
$424M $1.25 39.61% 74.83% $120.96
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
-- -- -- -- --
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
-- -- -- -- --
PWM
Prestige Wealth
-- -- -- -- --
TOP
TOP Financial Group
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
$0.56 -- $196B 5.50x $0.02 8.69% 2.17x
FUTU
Futu Holdings
$80.63 $120.96 $11.1B 19.78x $2.00 0% 7.63x
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
$1.34 -- $51.4M -- $0.00 0% 2.05x
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
$0.56 -- $11.4M -- $0.01 0% 5.77x
PWM
Prestige Wealth
$1.16 -- $10.6M -- $0.00 0% --
TOP
TOP Financial Group
$1.57 -- $58.1M 61.61x $0.00 0% 6.23x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
50.05% -2.015 247.92% 48.87x
FUTU
Futu Holdings
12.53% -0.177 3.97% 0.64x
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
22.88% -1.567 9.26% 0.30x
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
-- -0.028 -- 56.19x
PWM
Prestige Wealth
-- 0.110 -- --
TOP
TOP Financial Group
-- 0.472 -- 3.64x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
-- -- 4.8% 9.32% 147.3% $219.8B
FUTU
Futu Holdings
$360.4M $222M 14.51% 17.23% 50.39% --
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
-- -- -27.01% -30.78% -- --
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
-- -- -0.43% -0.43% -- --
PWM
Prestige Wealth
-- -- -- -- -- --
TOP
TOP Financial Group
-- -- 2.73% 2.73% -- --

Agricultural Bank of China vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or FUTU?

    Futu Holdings has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of 38.45%. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    -- $0.03 $858.5B
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings
    81.81% $1.21 $4.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or FUTU?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $120.96 which suggests that it could grow by 50.02%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Agricultural Bank of China, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Agricultural Bank of China.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    0 0 0
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings
    9 2 0
  • Is ACGBF or FUTU More Risky?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.988%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or FUTU?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.69%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or FUTU?

    Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $440.5M. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.50x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.17x versus 7.63x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    2.17x 5.50x $24.2B $11B
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings
    7.63x 19.78x $440.5M $169.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or MATH?

    Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    -- $0.03 $858.5B
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding
    -- -- $21.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or MATH?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    0 0 0
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is ACGBF or MATH More Risky?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.152%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or MATH?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.69%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or MATH?

    Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.50x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.17x versus 2.05x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    2.17x 5.50x $24.2B $11B
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding
    2.05x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or MEGL?

    Magic Empire Global has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    -- $0.03 $858.5B
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global
    -- -- $17.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or MEGL?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    0 0 0
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global
    0 0 0
  • Is ACGBF or MEGL More Risky?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or MEGL?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.69%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -326.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or MEGL?

    Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.50x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.17x versus 5.77x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    2.17x 5.50x $24.2B $11B
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global
    5.77x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or PWM?

    Prestige Wealth has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat Prestige Wealth's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    -- $0.03 $858.5B
    PWM
    Prestige Wealth
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or PWM?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prestige Wealth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Prestige Wealth, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Prestige Wealth.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    0 0 0
    PWM
    Prestige Wealth
    0 0 0
  • Is ACGBF or PWM More Risky?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Wealth has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or PWM?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.69%. Prestige Wealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Wealth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or PWM?

    Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than Prestige Wealth quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than Prestige Wealth's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.50x while Prestige Wealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.17x versus -- for Prestige Wealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    2.17x 5.50x $24.2B $11B
    PWM
    Prestige Wealth
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or TOP?

    TOP Financial Group has a net margin of 45.27% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.32% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    -- $0.03 $858.5B
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group
    -- -- $40.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or TOP?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    0 0 0
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group
    0 0 0
  • Is ACGBF or TOP More Risky?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or TOP?

    Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.69%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 68.92% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or TOP?

    Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $24.2B, which are larger than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $11B is higher than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.50x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.17x versus 6.23x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACGBF
    Agricultural Bank of China
    2.17x 5.50x $24.2B $11B
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group
    6.23x 61.61x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will American Tower Stock Recover?
Will American Tower Stock Recover?

The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…

Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?

Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…

Why Buy Domino’s Pizza Stock?
Why Buy Domino’s Pizza Stock?

When you think of growth stocks, you probably imagine technology…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 121x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
70
OKLO alert for Jan 6

Oklo [OKLO] is up 12.15% over the past day.

Sell
39
DOGZ alert for Jan 6

Dogness (International) [DOGZ] is down 9.81% over the past day.

Buy
66
DMRC alert for Jan 6

Digimarc [DMRC] is down 1.88% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock