KIE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Regional Banks ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Regional Banks ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than iShares US Regional Banks ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.561%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. iShares US Regional Banks ETF offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Regional Banks ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Regional Banks ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.472%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.671%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.185%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.