Is Okta a Good Stock to Buy?
Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA) is used by some of the largest firms…
Sell
40
KGRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.90
Seasonality move
:
4.94%
Day range:
$23.59 - $24.43
52-week range:
$18.74 - $28.00
Dividend yield:
1.39%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
15.5K
Avg. volume:
13.4K
1-year change:
18.71%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$23.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.39% | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
$27.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.69% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$79.47 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.68% | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
$21.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.27% | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
$14.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.23% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$26.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.9% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 1.345 | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | 0.699 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 1.058 | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | 1.041 | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | 1.520 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.598 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KGRN or ASHS?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KGRN or ASHS?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF0 0 0 -
Is KGRN or ASHS More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.757%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KGRN or ASHS?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KGRN or ASHS?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KGRN or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KGRN or GXC?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KGRN or GXC More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.087%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KGRN or GXC?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KGRN or GXC?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KGRN or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KGRN or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KGRN or KALL More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.436%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KGRN or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KGRN or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KGRN or KURE?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KGRN or KURE?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KGRN or KURE More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.25%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KGRN or KURE?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KGRN or KURE?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -- KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KGRN or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KGRN or PGJ?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KGRN or PGJ More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.245%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KGRN or PGJ?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KGRN or PGJ?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Fidelity High Dividend ETF a Good Investment Now?
Fidelity’s High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is a fund that offers…
Is Kinder Morgan Dividend Yield Worth It?
Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) is a major energy infrastructure company in…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 5
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 32.59% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 5
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 27.33% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 5
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is up 23.96% over the past day.
