Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Sell
35
GCAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$47.86
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$48.10 - $48.50
52-week range:
$47.72 - $51.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.4K
Avg. volume:
1.6K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
$48.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0% | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$23.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 2.94% | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$47.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0% | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$48.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 3.05% | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
$20.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3.7% | -- |
|
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
|
$23.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.005 | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.564 | -- | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | 0.793 | -- | -- |
|
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or CA?
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or CA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or CA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or CA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or CA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- CAXtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or CATF?
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or CATF?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or CATF More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or CATF?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or CATF?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or DFCA?
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or DFCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or DFCA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or DFCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or DFCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or MMCA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or MMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or MMCA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or MMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or MMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or RMNY?
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- RMNYRockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or RMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 RMNYRockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or RMNY More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or RMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or RMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- RMNYRockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
While already interesting as the world moves toward greener energy…
What Do Tesla Delivery Numbers Mean for Tesla Stock?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) released Q1 delivery numbers, showing a substantial slowdown…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
