Is Uber Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Uber (NYSE:UBER) has been through quite a ride over the…
Sell
24
ECON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.80
Seasonality move
:
0.78%
Day range:
$20.53 - $20.81
52-week range:
$18.97 - $23.13
Dividend yield:
0.76%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.4K
Avg. volume:
17.2K
1-year change:
3.58%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECON
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKF
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PIE
Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECON
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF
|
$20.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.76% | -- |
|
BKF
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
|
$37.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 2.32% | -- |
|
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF
|
$24.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 2.54% | -- |
|
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
|
$32.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 2.27% | -- |
|
PIE
Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF
|
$17.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 2.52% | -- |
|
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
|
$55.96 | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 | 5.27% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECON
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF
|
-- | 0.716 | -- | -- |
|
BKF
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
|
-- | 0.811 | -- | -- |
|
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | 0.406 | -- | -- |
|
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
|
-- | 0.683 | -- | -- |
|
PIE
Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF
|
-- | 0.119 | -- | -- |
|
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
|
-- | 0.642 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECON
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKF
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PIE
Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ECON or BKF?
iShares MSCI BIC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI BIC ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- BKFiShares MSCI BIC ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECON or BKF?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI BIC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI BIC ETF, analysts believe Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI BIC ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF0 0 0 BKFiShares MSCI BIC ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECON or BKF More Risky?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a beta of 0.733, which suggesting that the stock is 26.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI BIC ETF has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.855%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECON or BKF?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. iShares MSCI BIC ETF offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI BIC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECON or BKF?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI BIC ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI BIC ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI BIC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI BIC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- -- BKFiShares MSCI BIC ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECON or DBEM?
Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- DBEMXtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECON or DBEM?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF, analysts believe Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF0 0 0 DBEMXtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECON or DBEM More Risky?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a beta of 0.733, which suggesting that the stock is 26.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.58%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECON or DBEM?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECON or DBEM?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- -- DBEMXtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eqty ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECON or EEMX?
SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- EEMXSPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECON or EEMX?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF, analysts believe Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is more attractive than SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF0 0 0 EEMXSPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECON or EEMX More Risky?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a beta of 0.733, which suggesting that the stock is 26.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF has a beta of 0.917, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.35%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECON or EEMX?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECON or EEMX?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- -- EEMXSPDR MSCI Emerg Mkts Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECON or PIE?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- PIEInvesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECON or PIE?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF, analysts believe Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF0 0 0 PIEInvesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECON or PIE More Risky?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a beta of 0.733, which suggesting that the stock is 26.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.369%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECON or PIE?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECON or PIE?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- -- PIEInvesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Mo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECON or QEMM?
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- QEMMSPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECON or QEMM?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF, analysts believe Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is more attractive than SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF0 0 0 QEMMSPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECON or QEMM More Risky?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a beta of 0.733, which suggesting that the stock is 26.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.973%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECON or QEMM?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF offers a yield of 5.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECON or QEMM?
Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF-- -- -- -- QEMMSPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Like most of its peers in the semiconductor industry, Micron…
Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
91
TORXF alert for Apr 17
Torex Gold Resources [TORXF] is down 2.15% over the past day.
Sell
25
BULZ alert for Apr 17
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innov 3X Levd ETN [BULZ] is down 1.92% over the past day.
Sell
44
VIST alert for Apr 17
Vista Energy SAB de CV [VIST] is up 6.93% over the past day.
