Will Uber Stock Recover?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…
Sell
40
AOA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$75.71
Seasonality move
:
1.99%
Day range:
$75.61 - $76.28
52-week range:
$67.05 - $80.20
Dividend yield:
2.33%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
205.8K
Avg. volume:
159.3K
1-year change:
10.23%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$75.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.33% | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
$42.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 3.14% | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
$23.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.46 | 0% | -- |
|
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
|
$25.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0% | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
$19.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0% | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
$19.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 8.78% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.762 | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.521 | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | 0.768 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOMiShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOMiShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or AOM More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.278%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOMiShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or DRAI?
Draco Evolution AI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Draco Evolution AI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or DRAI?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Draco Evolution AI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Draco Evolution AI ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Draco Evolution AI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or DRAI More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Draco Evolution AI ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or DRAI?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Draco Evolution AI ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Draco Evolution AI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or DRAI?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Draco Evolution AI ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Draco Evolution AI ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Draco Evolution AI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Draco Evolution AI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or FARX?
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- FARXFrontier Asset Absolute Return ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or FARX?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 FARXFrontier Asset Absolute Return ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or FARX More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or FARX?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or FARX?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- FARXFrontier Asset Absolute Return ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or NDAA?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or NDAA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or NDAA More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or NDAA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or NDAA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or PCEF?
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or PCEF?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or PCEF More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a beta of 0.849, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.102%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or PCEF?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF offers a yield of 8.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or PCEF?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x
Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 11
Mercury General [MCY] is down 19.87% over the past day.
Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 11
Aritzia [ATZAF] is up 17.63% over the past day.
