WNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of -11.03%. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.67%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 98.28%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than WNS (Holdings), analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than WNS (Holdings).

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.757% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.01x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.71x versus 0.69x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Infosys has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of 15.88%. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Infosys's return on equity of 31.76%.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.67%. On the other hand Infosys has an analysts' consensus of $23.41 which suggests that it could grow by 2.79%. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Infosys, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Infosys.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.757% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infosys has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.47999999999999%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Infosys offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys pays out 56.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are smaller than Infosys quarterly revenues of $4.9B. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is lower than Infosys's net income of $777M. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.01x while Infosys's PE ratio is 29.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.71x versus 4.98x for Infosys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of --. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.67%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.71%. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.757% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.01x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.71x versus 9.99x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wipro has a net margin of 12.95% compared to WNS (Holdings)'s net margin of 14.39%. WNS (Holdings)'s return on equity of 15.85% beat Wipro's return on equity of 15.61%.

WNS (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.67%. On the other hand Wipro has an analysts' consensus of $2.58 which suggests that it could fall by -28.82%. Given that WNS (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Wipro, analysts believe WNS (Holdings) is more attractive than Wipro.

WNS (Holdings) has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.757% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wipro has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.184%.

WNS (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wipro offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. WNS (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wipro pays out 4.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Wipro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WNS (Holdings) quarterly revenues are $322.6M, which are smaller than Wipro quarterly revenues of $2.7B. WNS (Holdings)'s net income of $41.8M is lower than Wipro's net income of $383M. Notably, WNS (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.01x while Wipro's PE ratio is 27.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WNS (Holdings) is 1.71x versus 3.58x for Wipro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.