VVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of 21.19% compared to Valvoline's net margin of --. Valvoline's return on equity of 170.51% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.75, signalling upside risk potential of 25.55%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 962.5%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.08%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $435.5M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Valvoline's net income of $92.3M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.81x versus 0.05x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of 21.19% compared to Valvoline's net margin of -77.89%. Valvoline's return on equity of 170.51% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -110.99%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.75, signalling upside risk potential of 25.55%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.10 which suggests that it could grow by 89.57%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.504%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $435.5M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $99.6M. Valvoline's net income of $92.3M is higher than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$77.6M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.81x versus 1.10x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of 21.19% compared to Valvoline's net margin of -2.53%. Valvoline's return on equity of 170.51% beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.75, signalling upside risk potential of 25.55%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.59 which suggests that it could grow by 22.07%. Given that Valvoline has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Valvoline is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $435.5M, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $591.7M. Valvoline's net income of $92.3M is higher than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 380.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.81x versus 1.05x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of 21.19% compared to Valvoline's net margin of 8.96%. Valvoline's return on equity of 170.51% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.87%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.75, signalling upside risk potential of 25.55%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.51 which suggests that it could grow by 36.21%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $435.5M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $249.3M. Valvoline's net income of $92.3M is higher than Mister Car Wash's net income of $22.3M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 30.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.81x versus 2.36x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.