UVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Universal's net margin of 0.17%. Universal's return on equity of 8.44% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Universal is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Universal has a beta of 0.808, which suggesting that the stock is 19.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.577%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Universal pays 65.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Universal's net income of $130K is lower than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 18.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.49x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sadot Group has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Universal's net margin of 0.58%. Universal's return on equity of 8.44% beat Sadot Group's return on equity of 5.62%.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sadot Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 418.73%. Given that Sadot Group has higher upside potential than Universal, analysts believe Sadot Group is more attractive than Universal.

Universal has a beta of 0.808, which suggesting that the stock is 19.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sadot Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Sadot Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal pays 65.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sadot Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are larger than Sadot Group quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Universal's net income of $130K is lower than Sadot Group's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while Sadot Group's PE ratio is 14.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.49x versus 0.02x for Sadot Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tarsier has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Universal's net margin of --. Universal's return on equity of 8.44% beat Tarsier's return on equity of --.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tarsier has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal has higher upside potential than Tarsier, analysts believe Universal is more attractive than Tarsier.

Universal has a beta of 0.808, which suggesting that the stock is 19.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tarsier has a beta of -1.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 227.409%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Tarsier offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal pays 65.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Tarsier pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are larger than Tarsier quarterly revenues of --. Universal's net income of $130K is higher than Tarsier's net income of --. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while Tarsier's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.49x versus -- for Tarsier. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.