Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
48
UL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$57.57
Seasonality move
:
5.27%
Day range:
$57.03 - $57.26
52-week range:
$46.46 - $65.87
Dividend yield:
3.26%
P/E ratio:
20.19x
P/S ratio:
2.22x
P/B ratio:
6.50x
Volume:
947.3K
Avg. volume:
2.5M
1-year change:
18.9%
Market cap:
$141.6B
Revenue:
$64.5B
EPS (TTM):
$2.83
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$16.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $156.41 |
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
$20.8B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$57.19 | -- | $141.6B | 20.19x | $0.48 | 3.26% | 2.22x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
$36.26 | -- | $79.9B | -- | $0.74 | 8.28% | 2.47x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
$126.56 | $156.41 | $70.3B | 18.31x | $2.52 | 3.27% | 3.50x |
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
$32.18 | -- | $27B | 8.34x | $0.30 | 5.89% | 0.67x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
$12.04 | -- | $41.4B | 22.09x | $0.21 | 4.2% | 2.40x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
$14.01 | -- | $31.3B | 19.44x | $0.16 | 3.37% | 0.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | 0.069 | -- | 0.56x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
42.6% | 0.632 | 73.63% | 0.57x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
68.19% | 0.919 | 29.93% | 0.50x |
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
61.51% | -0.133 | 45.86% | 0.33x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
51.56% | -0.515 | 28.41% | 0.46x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
38.22% | 0.898 | 36.34% | 0.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | -- | 21.13% | 30.02% | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -13.43% | -22.5% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 32.7% | -- | -- |
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | 17.1% | 44.78% | -- | -- |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | 9.03% | 17.83% | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
-- | -- | 6.22% | 10.12% | -- | -- |
Unilever PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or BTI?
British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC-- -- $119.7B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or BTI?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.75%. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.96%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than British American Tobacco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC0 0 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC0 0 0 -
Is UL or BTI More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.486%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or BTI?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 8.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Unilever PLC pays 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or BTI?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.22x versus 2.47x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.22x 20.19x -- -- BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC2.47x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or DEO?
Diageo PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 32.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B DEODiageo PLC-- -- $33.6B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or DEO?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.75%. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $156.41 which suggests that it could grow by 6.22%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Diageo PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Diageo PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC0 0 0 DEODiageo PLC1 4 1 -
Is UL or DEO More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.888%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or DEO?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Unilever PLC pays 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or DEO?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.22x versus 3.50x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.22x 20.19x -- -- DEODiageo PLC3.50x 18.31x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or IMBBY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02% beat Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or IMBBY?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.75%. On the other hand Imperial Brands PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.66%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC0 0 0 IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 -
Is UL or IMBBY More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.951%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or IMBBY?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Imperial Brands PLC offers a yield of 5.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Unilever PLC pays 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC pays out 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or IMBBY?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Imperial Brands PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Imperial Brands PLC's PE ratio is 8.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.22x versus 0.67x for Imperial Brands PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.22x 20.19x -- -- IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.67x 8.34x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or RBGLY?
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02% beat Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC-- -- $21.1B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or RBGLY?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.75%. On the other hand Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC0 0 0 RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC0 0 0 -
Is UL or RBGLY More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.003%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or RBGLY?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Unilever PLC pays 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays out 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or RBGLY?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.22x versus 2.40x for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.22x 20.19x -- -- RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC2.40x 22.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or TSCDY?
Tesco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02% beat Tesco PLC's return on equity of 10.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B TSCDYTesco PLC-- -- $23.9B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or TSCDY?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.75%. On the other hand Tesco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.78%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Tesco PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Tesco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC0 0 0 TSCDYTesco PLC0 0 0 -
Is UL or TSCDY More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 51.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesco PLC has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or TSCDY?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Tesco PLC offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Unilever PLC pays 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesco PLC pays out 65.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or TSCDY?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tesco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Tesco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Tesco PLC's PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.22x versus 0.37x for Tesco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.22x 20.19x -- -- TSCDYTesco PLC0.37x 19.44x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 5.45% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.99% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.36% over the past day.
