TPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 25%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.29%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.29, signalling upside risk potential of 27.11%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $213.85 which suggests that it could grow by 91.69%. Given that Deckers Outdoor has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Deckers Outdoor is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.578, which suggesting that the stock is 57.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.9%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is lower than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $456.7M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 18.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.41x versus 3.48x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -13.65%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.29, signalling upside risk potential of 27.11%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $9.96 which suggests that it could grow by 58.12%. Given that Peloton Interactive has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Peloton Interactive is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.578, which suggesting that the stock is 57.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 1.946, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.602%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $674M. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is higher than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$92M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.41x versus 0.90x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 13.88%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.29, signalling upside risk potential of 27.11%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.48 which suggests that it could grow by 35.61%. Given that Ralph Lauren has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Ralph Lauren is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.578, which suggesting that the stock is 57.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.258%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.41x versus 2.00x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 9.17%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.29, signalling upside risk potential of 27.11%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $330.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Tesla.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.578, which suggesting that the stock is 57.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.36x while Tesla's PE ratio is 129.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.41x versus 9.43x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.