RPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 8.99% compared to RPM International's net margin of -0.63%. RPM International's return on equity of 25.26% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $136.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

RPM International has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.14999999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. RPM International's net income of $180.6M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.22x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 8.99% compared to RPM International's net margin of --. RPM International's return on equity of 25.26% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $136.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.6%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.14999999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. RPM International's net income of $180.6M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.22x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sherwin-Williams has a net margin of 8.99% compared to RPM International's net margin of 13.08%. RPM International's return on equity of 25.26% beat Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $136.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Sherwin-Williams has an analysts' consensus of $386.49 which suggests that it could grow by 11.53%. Given that Sherwin-Williams has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Sherwin-Williams is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.14999999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.965%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Sherwin-Williams offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues of $6.2B. RPM International's net income of $180.6M is lower than Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while Sherwin-Williams's PE ratio is 34.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.22x versus 3.84x for Sherwin-Williams. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 8.99% compared to RPM International's net margin of --. RPM International's return on equity of 25.26% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $136.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.21%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.14999999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. RPM International's net income of $180.6M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.22x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.