RPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H.B. Fuller has a net margin of 9.93% compared to RPM International's net margin of 1.68%. RPM International's return on equity of 25.92% beat H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $134.77, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand H.B. Fuller has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.1%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.184%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. H.B. Fuller offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller pays out 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues of $788.7M. RPM International's net income of $183.2M is higher than H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.24x while H.B. Fuller's PE ratio is 29.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.06x versus 0.92x for H.B. Fuller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries has a net margin of 9.93% compared to RPM International's net margin of -12.93%. RPM International's return on equity of 25.92% beat PPG Industries's return on equity of 14.3%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $134.77, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand PPG Industries has an analysts' consensus of $131.55 which suggests that it could grow by 19.47%. Given that PPG Industries has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe PPG Industries is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.905%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. PPG Industries offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries pays out 55.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than PPG Industries quarterly revenues of $2.2B. RPM International's net income of $183.2M is higher than PPG Industries's net income of -$280M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.24x while PPG Industries's PE ratio is 23.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.06x versus 1.63x for PPG Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perimeter Solutions has a net margin of 9.93% compared to RPM International's net margin of -30.92%. RPM International's return on equity of 25.92% beat Perimeter Solutions's return on equity of -0.54%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $134.77, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand Perimeter Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.53%. Given that Perimeter Solutions has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Perimeter Solutions is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perimeter Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Perimeter Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Perimeter Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Perimeter Solutions quarterly revenues of $86.2M. RPM International's net income of $183.2M is higher than Perimeter Solutions's net income of $144.2M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.24x while Perimeter Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.06x versus 2.77x for Perimeter Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sherwin-Williams has a net margin of 9.93% compared to RPM International's net margin of 9.06%. RPM International's return on equity of 25.92% beat Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 69.91%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $134.77, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand Sherwin-Williams has an analysts' consensus of $380.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.71%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.548%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Sherwin-Williams offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues of $5.3B. RPM International's net income of $183.2M is lower than Sherwin-Williams's net income of $480.1M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.24x while Sherwin-Williams's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 2.06x versus 3.89x for Sherwin-Williams. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.