RJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 17.64% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 27.05%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 11.9%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $155.14, signalling upside risk potential of 0.06%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $178.15 which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.25299999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.041%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 306.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Raymond James Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Raymond James Financial's net income of $602M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.97x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 58.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.61x versus 13.98x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 17.64% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 21.43%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.19%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $155.14, signalling upside risk potential of 0.06%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $42.88 which suggests that it could grow by 4.45%. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.25299999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.522%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 32.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $408.5M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $602M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $87.5M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.97x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 13.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.61x versus 2.06x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 17.64% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 23.55%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 10.26%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $155.14, signalling upside risk potential of 0.06%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $605.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.96%. Given that The Goldman Sachs Group has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.25299999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.781%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 49.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Raymond James Financial's net income of $602M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $3B. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.97x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.61x versus 3.74x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital has a net margin of 17.64% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 4.96%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 1.99%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $155.14, signalling upside risk potential of 0.06%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.02 which suggests that it could grow by 6.5%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.25299999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Blue Owl Capital offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital pays out 456.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Raymond James Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital's is not.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues of $600.9M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $602M is higher than Blue Owl Capital's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.97x while Blue Owl Capital's PE ratio is 765.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.61x versus 8.17x for Blue Owl Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.