RJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evercore has a net margin of 17.22% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 14.4%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 19.19% beat Evercore's return on equity of 21.3%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $174.07, signalling upside risk potential of 23.4%. On the other hand Evercore has an analysts' consensus of $292.43 which suggests that it could grow by 41.38%. Given that Evercore has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe Evercore is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.842%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Evercore offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore pays out 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Evercore quarterly revenues of $975.3M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $600M is higher than Evercore's net income of $140.4M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Evercore's PE ratio is 22.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.27x versus 2.89x for Evercore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 17.22% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of -3.86%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 19.19% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 1.04%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $174.07, signalling upside risk potential of 23.4%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Raymond James Financial has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Raymond James Financial is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.802, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.201%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $600M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$86K. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 83.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.27x versus 3.38x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 17.22% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 34.53%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 19.19% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $174.07, signalling upside risk potential of 23.4%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.90 which suggests that it could grow by 14.68%. Given that Raymond James Financial has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Raymond James Financial is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.615%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Raymond James Financial's net income of $600M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 26.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.27x versus 7.33x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 17.22% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 27.96%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 19.19% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 25.84%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $174.07, signalling upside risk potential of 23.4%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.01%. Given that Raymond James Financial has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Raymond James Financial is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.56% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.843%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $557.2M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $600M is higher than SEI Investments's net income of $155.8M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.27x versus 4.70x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.