RAMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innodata has a net margin of 0.93% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of 33.3%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat Innodata's return on equity of 67.04%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.95%. On the other hand Innodata has an analysts' consensus of $46.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Innodata, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Innodata.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innodata has a beta of 2.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.788%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innodata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innodata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $185.5M, which are larger than Innodata quarterly revenues of $52.2M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $1.7M is lower than Innodata's net income of $17.4M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 614.20x while Innodata's PE ratio is 76.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.94x versus 10.22x for Innodata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of 0.93% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of -4.43%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 33.73%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.95%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $98.60 which suggests that it could grow by 4.38%. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Pegasystems.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.458%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 14.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $185.5M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $325.1M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $1.7M is higher than Pegasystems's net income of -$14.4M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 614.20x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 67.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.94x versus 5.57x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Raadr has a net margin of 0.93% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of --. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat Raadr's return on equity of --.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.95%. On the other hand Raadr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Raadr, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Raadr.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raadr has a beta of 1.901, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.143%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Raadr offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Raadr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $185.5M, which are larger than Raadr quarterly revenues of --. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $1.7M is higher than Raadr's net income of --. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 614.20x while Raadr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.94x versus 0.24x for Raadr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 0.93% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of -8.33%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 88.84%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.95%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $19.64 which suggests that it could grow by 22.93%. Given that NCR Voyix has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe NCR Voyix is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.967, which suggesting that the stock is 3.31% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.637%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out -3.55% of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $185.5M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $711M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $1.7M is lower than NCR Voyix's net income of $1.1B. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 614.20x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 3.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.94x versus 0.51x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.