QS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoZone has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 13.2%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat AutoZone's return on equity of --.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.53, signalling upside risk potential of 22.4%. On the other hand AutoZone has an analysts' consensus of $3,610.22 which suggests that it could grow by 10.97%. Given that QuantumScape has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe QuantumScape is more attractive than AutoZone.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.819%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoZone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoZone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AutoZone quarterly revenues of $4.3B. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than AutoZone's net income of $564.9M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AutoZone's PE ratio is 21.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 3.08x for AutoZone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuvve Holding has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of -91.19%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26%.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.53, signalling upside risk potential of 22.4%. On the other hand Nuvve Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34743.21%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuvve Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuvve Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues of $1.8M. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuvve Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 0.28x for Nuvve Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 15.25%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.53, signalling upside risk potential of 22.4%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,136.09 which suggests that it could grow by 4.32%. Given that QuantumScape has higher upside potential than O'Reilly Automotive, analysts believe QuantumScape is more attractive than O'Reilly Automotive.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.381%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.4B. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $665.5M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 30.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 4.38x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarParts.com has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of -6.92%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat CarParts.com's return on equity of -28.91%.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.53, signalling upside risk potential of 22.4%. On the other hand CarParts.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.74%. Given that CarParts.com has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe CarParts.com is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarParts.com has a beta of 2.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.676%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarParts.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarParts.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CarParts.com quarterly revenues of $144.8M. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than CarParts.com's net income of -$10M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarParts.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 0.09x for CarParts.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.