OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 9.49%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.22 which suggests that it could grow by 25.62%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, which suggesting that the stock is 142.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.274%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are smaller than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 14.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.77x versus 1.32x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 10.96%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $34.19 which suggests that it could grow by 36.36%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, which suggesting that the stock is 142.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.903%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.77x versus 0.96x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 16.73%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $29.90 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, which suggesting that the stock is 142.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.412%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.77x versus 3.98x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -6.25%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could grow by 1.63%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, which suggesting that the stock is 142.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 257.676%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.77x versus 0.08x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.