NPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -1793.28% compared to NET Power's net margin of -2.72%. NET Power's return on equity of 0.34% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

NET Power has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 273.23%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 172.11%. Given that NET Power has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe NET Power is more attractive than Broadwind.

NET Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.113%.

NET Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NET Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NET Power quarterly revenues are $12K, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. NET Power's net income of -$34.3M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, NET Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.54x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 27.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NET Power is -- versus 0.23x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a net margin of -1793.28% compared to NET Power's net margin of --. NET Power's return on equity of 0.34% beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of --.

NET Power has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 273.23%. On the other hand Nano Nuclear Energy has an analysts' consensus of $47.50 which suggests that it could grow by 82.97%. Given that NET Power has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe NET Power is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

NET Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NET Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nano Nuclear Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NET Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Nuclear Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NET Power quarterly revenues are $12K, which are larger than Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues of --. NET Power's net income of -$34.3M is lower than Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, NET Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.54x while Nano Nuclear Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NET Power is -- versus -- for Nano Nuclear Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -1793.28% compared to NET Power's net margin of -814.55%. NET Power's return on equity of 0.34% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

NET Power has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 273.23%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NET Power has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe NET Power is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

NET Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

NET Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NET Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NET Power quarterly revenues are $12K, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. NET Power's net income of -$34.3M is lower than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, NET Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.54x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NET Power is -- versus 6.50x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -1793.28% compared to NET Power's net margin of -11.09%. NET Power's return on equity of 0.34% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

NET Power has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 273.23%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 350.91%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than NET Power, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than NET Power.

NET Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.084%.

NET Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NET Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NET Power quarterly revenues are $12K, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. NET Power's net income of -$34.3M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, NET Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.54x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NET Power is -- versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.