NGVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Mosaic has a net margin of -28.44% compared to Ingevity's net margin of 4.35%. Ingevity's return on equity of -116.58% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 3.06%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.35%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than The Mosaic, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than The Mosaic.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.650, which suggesting that the stock is 65.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.838%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $376.9M, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Ingevity's net income of -$107.2M is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 24.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 0.98x versus 0.76x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -28.44% compared to Ingevity's net margin of --. Ingevity's return on equity of -116.58% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.35%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 227.87%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.650, which suggesting that the stock is 65.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $376.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Ingevity's net income of -$107.2M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 0.98x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -28.44% compared to Ingevity's net margin of 7.32%. Ingevity's return on equity of -116.58% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.35%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $137.56 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.650, which suggesting that the stock is 65.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $376.9M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Ingevity's net income of -$107.2M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 11.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 0.98x versus 1.09x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -28.44% compared to Ingevity's net margin of --. Ingevity's return on equity of -116.58% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.35%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.48%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.650, which suggesting that the stock is 65.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $376.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Ingevity's net income of -$107.2M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 0.98x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.