MSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -12.01% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 2.32%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -12.62% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.49 which suggests that it could grow by 55.52%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Melco Resorts and Entertainment, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Melco Resorts and Entertainment.

Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.418, which suggesting that the stock is 141.767% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.817%.

Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$21M is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 2.01x versus 0.58x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -12.01% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 0.33%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -12.62% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92%.

Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 607.55%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Studio City International Holdings, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Studio City International Holdings.

Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.418, which suggesting that the stock is 141.767% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.913%.

Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 18.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$21M is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 58.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 2.01x versus 1.13x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of -12.01% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of --. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -12.62% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.418, which suggesting that the stock is 141.767% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$21M is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 2.01x versus 5.60x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SJM Holdings has a net margin of -12.01% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 1.44%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -12.62% beat SJM Holdings's return on equity of --.

Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand SJM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.418, which suggesting that the stock is 141.767% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.048%.

Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SJM Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are smaller than SJM Holdings quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$21M is lower than SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SJM Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 2.01x versus 1.33x for SJM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.