MPX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Marine Products's net margin of -2.94%. Marine Products's return on equity of 13.37% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -14.12%.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.18%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.33%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than Marine Products.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.304%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Products pays 46.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $49.9M, which are smaller than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $171.6M. Marine Products's net income of $3.4M is higher than Malibu Boats's net income of -$5M. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.18x versus 1.00x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Marine Products's net margin of -7.87%. Marine Products's return on equity of 13.37% beat MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -1.88%.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.18%. On the other hand MasterCraft Boat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.93%. Given that MasterCraft Boat Holdings has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe MasterCraft Boat Holdings is more attractive than Marine Products.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.645, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.509%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Products pays 46.25% of its earnings as a dividend. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $49.9M, which are smaller than MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues of $65.4M. Marine Products's net income of $3.4M is higher than MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while MasterCraft Boat Holdings's PE ratio is 43.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.18x versus 0.95x for MasterCraft Boat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Marine Products's net margin of 1.61%. Marine Products's return on equity of 13.37% beat Polaris's return on equity of 14.92%.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.18%. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $78.79 which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Marine Products.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.614%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Polaris offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Marine Products pays 46.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $49.9M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Marine Products's net income of $3.4M is lower than Polaris's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Polaris's PE ratio is 15.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.18x versus 0.42x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Lighting Group has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Marine Products's net margin of -223.31%. Marine Products's return on equity of 13.37% beat US Lighting Group's return on equity of --.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.18%. On the other hand US Lighting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marine Products has higher upside potential than US Lighting Group, analysts believe Marine Products is more attractive than US Lighting Group.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Lighting Group has a beta of 2.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.255%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. US Lighting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Products pays 46.25% of its earnings as a dividend. US Lighting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $49.9M, which are larger than US Lighting Group quarterly revenues of $151.8K. Marine Products's net income of $3.4M is higher than US Lighting Group's net income of -$339K. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while US Lighting Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.18x versus 0.40x for US Lighting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.