MMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Maximus's net margin of 7.18%. Maximus's return on equity of 17.37% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14%.

Maximus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.23%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.87%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

Maximus has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 27.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.548%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $926M. Maximus's net income of $72.5M is higher than FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 22.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.85x versus 1.86x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Maximus's net margin of 7.18%. Maximus's return on equity of 17.37% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

Maximus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.23%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Maximus has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 27.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.553%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. Maximus's net income of $72.5M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 26.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.85x versus 1.57x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Maximus's net margin of 6.32%. Maximus's return on equity of 17.37% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.6%.

Maximus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.23%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.5%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than ICF International, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than ICF International.

Maximus has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 27.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.825%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $517M. Maximus's net income of $72.5M is higher than ICF International's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while ICF International's PE ratio is 20.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.85x versus 1.11x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Initio has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Maximus's net margin of --. Maximus's return on equity of 17.37% beat Initio's return on equity of --.

Maximus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.23%. On the other hand Initio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Initio, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Initio.

Maximus has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 27.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.339%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Initio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Initio quarterly revenues of --. Maximus's net income of $72.5M is higher than Initio's net income of --. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while Initio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.85x versus -- for Initio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.