LVS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Monarch Casino & Resort has a net margin of 11.19% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 3.13%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4% beat Monarch Casino & Resort's return on equity of 14.26%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $57.42, signalling upside risk potential of 78.87%. On the other hand Monarch Casino & Resort has an analysts' consensus of $91.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.98%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Monarch Casino & Resort, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Monarch Casino & Resort.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monarch Casino & Resort has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.347%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Monarch Casino & Resort offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Monarch Casino & Resort pays out 30.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Monarch Casino & Resort quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M is higher than Monarch Casino & Resort's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.29x while Monarch Casino & Resort's PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.09x versus 2.66x for Monarch Casino & Resort. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGM Resorts International has a net margin of 11.19% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 3.62%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 18.81%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $57.42, signalling upside risk potential of 78.87%. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $49.04 which suggests that it could grow by 86.47%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.960, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.997%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M is higher than MGM Resorts International's net income of $157.4M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.29x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 10.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.09x versus 0.47x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PENN Entertainment has a net margin of 11.19% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of -7.99%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity of -10.23%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $57.42, signalling upside risk potential of 78.87%. On the other hand PENN Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $23.28 which suggests that it could grow by 65.59%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than PENN Entertainment, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than PENN Entertainment.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PENN Entertainment has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.887%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. PENN Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. PENN Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than PENN Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M is higher than PENN Entertainment's net income of -$133.3M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.29x while PENN Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.09x versus 0.33x for PENN Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 11.19% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 15.06%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $57.42, signalling upside risk potential of 78.87%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $113.11 which suggests that it could grow by 66.46%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Wynn Resorts, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Wynn Resorts.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.494%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of $277M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.29x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 16.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.09x versus 1.05x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.