LNN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alamo Group has a net margin of 14.64% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 6.83%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.66% beat Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $132.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Alamo Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.07%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alamo Group has a beta of 1.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.407%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Alamo Group offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group pays out 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $139.2M, which are smaller than Alamo Group quarterly revenues of $401.3M. Lindsay's net income of $20.4M is lower than Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.22x while Alamo Group's PE ratio is 18.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.21x versus 1.35x for Alamo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 14.64% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 11.5%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.66% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 31.44%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $132.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $464.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.42%. Given that Lindsay has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Lindsay is more attractive than Deere &.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.711%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $139.2M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Lindsay's net income of $20.4M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.22x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.21x versus 2.37x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Toro has a net margin of 14.64% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 8.36%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.66% beat The Toro's return on equity of 26.52%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $132.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand The Toro has an analysts' consensus of $93.20 which suggests that it could grow by 16.2%. Given that The Toro has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe The Toro is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Toro has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.522%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. The Toro offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. The Toro pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $139.2M, which are smaller than The Toro quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Lindsay's net income of $20.4M is lower than The Toro's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.22x while The Toro's PE ratio is 20.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.21x versus 1.83x for The Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 14.64% compared to Lindsay's net margin of -4.07%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.66% beat Titan International's return on equity of -1.73%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $132.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.43%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 72.66%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.744%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $139.2M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $448M. Lindsay's net income of $20.4M is higher than Titan International's net income of -$18.2M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.22x while Titan International's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.21x versus 0.26x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.