LDOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of --. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $171.87, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 25.63%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$193M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.10x versus 160.06x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 6.75%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $171.87, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.83%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 39.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.10x versus 2.05x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 16.6%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $171.87, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $254.51 which suggests that it could grow by 2.35%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.796%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Business Machines's is not.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $17.6B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 38.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.10x versus 3.70x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gartner has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 23.24%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Gartner's return on equity of 140.26%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $171.87, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand Gartner has an analysts' consensus of $551.81 which suggests that it could grow by 31.47%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gartner has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.975%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Gartner offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Gartner pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Gartner quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is lower than Gartner's net income of $398.6M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Gartner's PE ratio is 26.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.10x versus 5.24x for Gartner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.