Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
33
KW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.12
Seasonality move
:
2.39%
Day range:
$10.04 - $10.27
52-week range:
$7.85 - $12.74
Dividend yield:
7.02%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.64x
P/B ratio:
1.71x
Volume:
209.4K
Avg. volume:
582.5K
1-year change:
-18.05%
Market cap:
$1.4B
Revenue:
$562.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$2.58
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
-- | -$0.11 | -- | -40% | $10.70 |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
$696.1M | $0.16 | 9.52% | -6.21% | $90.38 |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
$78.2M | $0.36 | -2.02% | 220.66% | $9.13 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
$10.26 | $10.70 | $1.4B | -- | $0.12 | 7.02% | 2.64x |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
$72.95 | $90.38 | $29.9B | 165.80x | $0.00 | 0% | 11.15x |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
$1.17 | -- | $6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 40.85x |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
$2.20 | -- | $19.3M | 47.71x | $0.01 | 0.91% | 2.58x |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
$1.26 | -- | $4.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.35x |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
$10.98 | $9.13 | $207.2M | -- | $0.23 | 0% | 0.66x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
76.43% | 0.697 | 222.94% | 1.27x |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
11.69% | 0.825 | 3.21% | 9.49x |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
-- | -0.358 | -- | 7.05x |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
66.4% | 1.710 | 78.31% | 1.15x |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
79.12% | 4.002 | 335.32% | 0.24x |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
51.08% | 2.503 | -176.77% | 0.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
$88.5M | $16.9M | -4.44% | -17.44% | -8.31% | -$27.7M |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
$552M | $23.7M | 2.1% | 2.39% | 3.42% | $13.7M |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
-- | -$56K | -0.83% | -0.83% | -151.35% | $14K |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
$882.1K | -$130.3K | -7.22% | -36.77% | -6.88% | -$146.7K |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
$932.6K | $392.1K | -39.63% | -104.5% | 38.39% | -$161.8K |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
$58.4M | $15.2M | -2.56% | -- | 20.61% | $16.3M |
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or CSGP?
CoStar Group has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of 7.65%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat CoStar Group's return on equity of 2.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B CSGPCoStar Group79.7% $0.13 $8.5B -
What do Analysts Say About KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand CoStar Group has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 23.9%. Given that CoStar Group has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, analysts believe CoStar Group is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 CSGPCoStar Group5 4 0 -
Is KW or CSGP More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoStar Group has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. CoStar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. CoStar Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are smaller than CoStar Group quarterly revenues of $692.6M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than CoStar Group's net income of $53M. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoStar Group's PE ratio is 165.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.64x versus 11.15x for CoStar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.64x -- $127.5M -$66.6M CSGPCoStar Group11.15x 165.80x $692.6M $53M
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or GBR?
New Concept Energy has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -10.81%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B GBRNew Concept Energy-- -$0.01 $4.6M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than New Concept Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 GBRNew Concept Energy0 0 0 -
Is KW or GBR More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.296, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.439%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.64x versus 40.85x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.64x -- $127.5M -$66.6M GBRNew Concept Energy40.85x -- $37K -$4K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or IHT?
InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -15.14%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B IHTInnSuites Hospitality Trust48.33% -$0.03 $12M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or IHT?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 IHTInnSuites Hospitality Trust0 0 0 -
Is KW or IHT More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.314%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or IHT?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or IHT?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 47.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.64x versus 2.58x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.64x -- $127.5M -$66.6M IHTInnSuites Hospitality Trust2.58x 47.71x $1.8M -$276.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or PW?
Power REIT has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -22.79%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat Power REIT's return on equity of -104.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B PWPower REIT65.4% -$0.14 $46.8M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or PW?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Power REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3392.06%. Given that Power REIT has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, analysts believe Power REIT is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 PWPower REIT0 0 0 -
Is KW or PW More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power REIT has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.267%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or PW?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Power REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Power REIT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or PW?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than Power REIT quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than Power REIT's net income of -$325K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power REIT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.64x versus 1.35x for Power REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.64x -- $127.5M -$66.6M PWPower REIT1.35x -- $1.4M -$325K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or RMAX?
RE/MAX Holdings has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of 1.23%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat RE/MAX Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B RMAXRE/MAX Holdings74.39% $0.05 $380M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or RMAX?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand RE/MAX Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.13 which suggests that it could fall by -11.2%. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than RE/MAX Holdings, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than RE/MAX Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 RMAXRE/MAX Holdings0 5 1 -
Is KW or RMAX More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RE/MAX Holdings has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.79%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or RMAX?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. RE/MAX Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. RE/MAX Holdings pays out -19.64% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or RMAX?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than RE/MAX Holdings quarterly revenues of $78.5M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than RE/MAX Holdings's net income of $966K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RE/MAX Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.64x versus 0.66x for RE/MAX Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.64x -- $127.5M -$66.6M RMAXRE/MAX Holdings0.66x -- $78.5M $966K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 10.1% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.77% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.45% over the past day.
