ITT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kadant has a net margin of 18.2% compared to ITT's net margin of 11.63%. ITT's return on equity of 18.73% beat Kadant's return on equity of 14.42%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $170.40, signalling upside risk potential of 18.09%. On the other hand Kadant has an analysts' consensus of $341.67 which suggests that it could fall by -3.49%. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Kadant, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Kadant.

ITT has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kadant has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.464%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Kadant offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. ITT pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Kadant pays out 11.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $885.2M, which are larger than Kadant quarterly revenues of $271.6M. ITT's net income of $161.1M is higher than Kadant's net income of $31.6M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.62x while Kadant's PE ratio is 36.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.37x versus 4.03x for Kadant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 18.2% compared to ITT's net margin of 16.41%. ITT's return on equity of 18.73% beat Nordson's return on equity of 16.81%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $170.40, signalling upside risk potential of 18.09%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $257.29 which suggests that it could grow by 21.2%. Given that Nordson has higher upside potential than ITT, analysts believe Nordson is more attractive than ITT.

ITT has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.831%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. ITT pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $885.2M, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $744.5M. ITT's net income of $161.1M is higher than Nordson's net income of $122.2M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.62x while Nordson's PE ratio is 26.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.37x versus 4.55x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taylor Devices has a net margin of 18.2% compared to ITT's net margin of 20.49%. ITT's return on equity of 18.73% beat Taylor Devices's return on equity of 17.62%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $170.40, signalling upside risk potential of 18.09%. On the other hand Taylor Devices has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Taylor Devices, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Taylor Devices.

ITT has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taylor Devices has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.715%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Taylor Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ITT pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Taylor Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ITT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $885.2M, which are larger than Taylor Devices quarterly revenues of $12.1M. ITT's net income of $161.1M is higher than Taylor Devices's net income of $2.5M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.62x while Taylor Devices's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.37x versus 3.11x for Taylor Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPI Composites has a net margin of 18.2% compared to ITT's net margin of -10.52%. ITT's return on equity of 18.73% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $170.40, signalling upside risk potential of 18.09%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 113.59%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than ITT, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than ITT.

ITT has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 1.819, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.876%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ITT pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ITT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $885.2M, which are larger than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $380.8M. ITT's net income of $161.1M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$40.1M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.62x while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.37x versus 0.07x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.