ITT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 14.36%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 24.44%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $169.91, signalling upside risk potential of 27.33%. On the other hand Enerpac Tool Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.55%. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Enerpac Tool Group, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Enerpac Tool Group.

ITT has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.267%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Enerpac Tool Group offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Enerpac Tool Group quarterly revenues of $145.5M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Enerpac Tool Group's net income of $20.9M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.18x while Enerpac Tool Group's PE ratio is 27.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.02x versus 4.21x for Enerpac Tool Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 3.38%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $169.91, signalling upside risk potential of 27.33%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 75.56%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than ITT, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than ITT.

ITT has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.117%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ITT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.18x while Graham's PE ratio is 36.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.02x versus 1.65x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 15.38%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $169.91, signalling upside risk potential of 27.33%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $252.06 which suggests that it could grow by 23.96%. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Nordson.

ITT has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.18x while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.02x versus 4.38x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taylor Devices has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 18.95%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Taylor Devices's return on equity of 15.37%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $169.91, signalling upside risk potential of 27.33%. On the other hand Taylor Devices has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Taylor Devices, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Taylor Devices.

ITT has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.71% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taylor Devices has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.663%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Taylor Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Taylor Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ITT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Taylor Devices quarterly revenues of $10.6M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Taylor Devices's net income of $2M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.18x while Taylor Devices's PE ratio is 13.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.02x versus 2.54x for Taylor Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.