HG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 14.9% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of 11.97%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.31%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $426.09 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.941%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $509M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.24x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.91x versus 0.97x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 14.9% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of 40.78%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.31%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -68.93%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.446%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.24x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.91x versus 3.66x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 14.9% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of -402.57%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.31%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 50.38%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.781%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.24x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.91x versus 1.66x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 14.9% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of 29.8%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.31%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $294.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.23%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.003%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are smaller than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $4B. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M is lower than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.24x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 3.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.91x versus 1.03x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.