Is Target a Dividend King?
Popular retail giant Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT) has been in a…
Buy
58
GOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.25
Seasonality move
:
1.08%
Day range:
$15.23 - $15.36
52-week range:
$12.97 - $16.08
Dividend yield:
14.34%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
892.2K
1-year change:
13.82%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSCO
FS Credit Opp Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
$15.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 14.34% | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
$10.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 9.53% | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
$9.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 7% | -- |
|
FSCO
FS Credit Opp Corp.
|
$6.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 10.33% | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
$18.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 14.11% | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
$14.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 8.47% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | 0.176 | -- | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
-- | 1.637 | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | 1.192 | -- | -- |
|
FSCO
FS Credit Opp Corp.
|
-- | 0.136 | -- | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
-- | 0.910 | -- | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
-- | 0.361 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSCO
FS Credit Opp Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or BTZ?
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- BTZBlackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or BTZ?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 BTZBlackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is GOF or BTZ More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust has a beta of 2.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or BTZ?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.34%. Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust offers a yield of 9.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or BTZ?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- BTZBlackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or EVV?
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or EVV?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GOF or EVV More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.122%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or EVV?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.34%. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund offers a yield of 7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or EVV?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or FSCO?
FS Credit Opp Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat FS Credit Opp Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- FSCOFS Credit Opp Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or FSCO?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FS Credit Opp Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than FS Credit Opp Corp., analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than FS Credit Opp Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 FSCOFS Credit Opp Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GOF or FSCO More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FS Credit Opp Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or FSCO?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.34%. FS Credit Opp Corp. offers a yield of 10.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FS Credit Opp Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or FSCO?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FS Credit Opp Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than FS Credit Opp Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FS Credit Opp Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for FS Credit Opp Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- FSCOFS Credit Opp Corp.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or PDI?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- PDIPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or PDI?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 PDIPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GOF or PDI More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.729%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or PDI?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.34%. PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund offers a yield of 14.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or PDI?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- PDIPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or PTY?
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- PTYPIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or PTY?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 PTYPIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds0 0 0 -
Is GOF or PTY More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.198%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or PTY?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.34%. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds offers a yield of 8.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or PTY?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- PTYPIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Sell
44
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
72
HEES alert for Jan 15
H&E Equipment Services [HEES] is up 105.42% over the past day.
Sell
26
SIG alert for Jan 15
Signet Jewelers [SIG] is down 21.66% over the past day.
Sell
45
WGS alert for Jan 15
GeneDx Holdings [WGS] is down 15.3% over the past day.
