FSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graham has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 3.38%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 19.73% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.7%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 63.51%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.966%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $472M, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. Federal Signal's net income of $50M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Graham's PE ratio is 38.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 2.60x versus 1.78x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gates Industrial Corp PLC has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 4.41%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 19.73% beat Gates Industrial Corp PLC's return on equity of 5.62%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.7%. On the other hand Gates Industrial Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $26.27 which suggests that it could grow by 34.39%. Given that Gates Industrial Corp PLC has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe Gates Industrial Corp PLC is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gates Industrial Corp PLC has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.876%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Gates Industrial Corp PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gates Industrial Corp PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $472M, which are smaller than Gates Industrial Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $829.4M. Federal Signal's net income of $50M is higher than Gates Industrial Corp PLC's net income of $36.6M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Gates Industrial Corp PLC's PE ratio is 26.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 2.60x versus 1.52x for Gates Industrial Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -161.83%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 19.73% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.7%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federal Signal has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Federal Signal is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.665%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $472M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Federal Signal's net income of $50M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 2.60x versus 6.68x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 10.59% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -11.09%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 19.73% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.7%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 336.57%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $472M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Federal Signal's net income of $50M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 2.60x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.