EGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadstone Net Lease has a net margin of 35.75% compared to EastGroup Properties's net margin of 23.54%. EastGroup Properties's return on equity of 8.04% beat Broadstone Net Lease's return on equity of 5.11%.

EastGroup Properties has a consensus price target of $198.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.04%. On the other hand Broadstone Net Lease has an analysts' consensus of $18.89 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that EastGroup Properties has higher upside potential than Broadstone Net Lease, analysts believe EastGroup Properties is more attractive than Broadstone Net Lease.

EastGroup Properties has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadstone Net Lease has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EastGroup Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Broadstone Net Lease offers a yield of 6.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. EastGroup Properties pays 111% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadstone Net Lease pays out 133.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EastGroup Properties quarterly revenues are $164M, which are larger than Broadstone Net Lease quarterly revenues of $112.1M. EastGroup Properties's net income of $58.6M is higher than Broadstone Net Lease's net income of $26.4M. Notably, EastGroup Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.02x while Broadstone Net Lease's PE ratio is 19.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EastGroup Properties is 13.51x versus 7.76x for Broadstone Net Lease. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 35.75% compared to EastGroup Properties's net margin of 31.6%. EastGroup Properties's return on equity of 8.04% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87%.

EastGroup Properties has a consensus price target of $198.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.04%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $24.74 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than EastGroup Properties, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than EastGroup Properties.

EastGroup Properties has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.568%.

EastGroup Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. EastGroup Properties pays 111% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EastGroup Properties quarterly revenues are $164M, which are smaller than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $525.4M. EastGroup Properties's net income of $58.6M is lower than Kimco Realty's net income of $166M. Notably, EastGroup Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.02x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 37.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EastGroup Properties is 13.51x versus 6.93x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 35.75% compared to EastGroup Properties's net margin of 4.81%. EastGroup Properties's return on equity of 8.04% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

EastGroup Properties has a consensus price target of $198.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.04%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.71%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than EastGroup Properties, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than EastGroup Properties.

EastGroup Properties has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EastGroup Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. EastGroup Properties pays 111% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EastGroup Properties's is not.

EastGroup Properties quarterly revenues are $164M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. EastGroup Properties's net income of $58.6M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, EastGroup Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.02x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 20.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EastGroup Properties is 13.51x versus 0.70x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veris Residential has a net margin of 35.75% compared to EastGroup Properties's net margin of -18.28%. EastGroup Properties's return on equity of 8.04% beat Veris Residential's return on equity of -1.82%.

EastGroup Properties has a consensus price target of $198.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.04%. On the other hand Veris Residential has an analysts' consensus of $19.79 which suggests that it could grow by 18.3%. Given that Veris Residential has higher upside potential than EastGroup Properties, analysts believe Veris Residential is more attractive than EastGroup Properties.

EastGroup Properties has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veris Residential has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.502%.

EastGroup Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Veris Residential offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. EastGroup Properties pays 111% of its earnings as a dividend. Veris Residential pays out -104.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

EastGroup Properties quarterly revenues are $164M, which are larger than Veris Residential quarterly revenues of $68.1M. EastGroup Properties's net income of $58.6M is higher than Veris Residential's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, EastGroup Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.02x while Veris Residential's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EastGroup Properties is 13.51x versus 6.27x for Veris Residential. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.