DDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -18.51%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat GoPro's return on equity of -166.14%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 88.95%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $1.10 which suggests that it could grow by 30.8%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than GoPro.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.663% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.894%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $200.9M. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than GoPro's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.76x versus 0.16x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 3.26%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 88.95%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 64.21%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Immersion, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Immersion.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.663% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.550, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.003%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.76x versus 0.20x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 11.54%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 6.29%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 88.95%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of $39.89 which suggests that it could grow by 10.65%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.663% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.846%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.4B. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $162M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 42.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.76x versus 2.36x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -158.16% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -77.77%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -119.98% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -26.59%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 88.95%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 71.32%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Transact Technologies, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Transact Technologies.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.663% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.804, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.389%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $112.9M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.2M. 3D Systems's net income of -$178.6M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of -$8M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.76x versus 0.91x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.