NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Buy
60
CWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.89
Seasonality move
:
-12.64%
Day range:
$19.98 - $21.31
52-week range:
$17.29 - $28.72
Dividend yield:
2.35%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.27x
P/B ratio:
11.88x
Volume:
2.7M
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-18.13%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$6.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.69
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings
|
$1.6B | $0.09 | 2.09% | -15.58% | -- |
|
CMOT
Curtiss Motorcycles
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$344.4M | -$0.15 | -8.75% | -52.61% | -- |
|
GORV
Lazydays Holdings
|
$228M | -$0.89 | -12.89% | -84.19% | $3.50 |
|
HZO
MarineMax
|
$576.9M | $0.28 | -7.92% | 53.85% | $39.63 |
|
LAD
Lithia Motors
|
$9.5B | $7.60 | 17.76% | -4.81% | $397.40 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings
|
$21.31 | -- | $1.3B | -- | $0.13 | 2.35% | 0.27x |
|
CMOT
Curtiss Motorcycles
|
$0.0325 | -- | $958.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.39x |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$53.17 | -- | $438.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.27x |
|
GORV
Lazydays Holdings
|
$0.83 | $3.50 | $49.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
HZO
MarineMax
|
$28.35 | $39.63 | $640.6M | 17.18x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.27x |
|
LAD
Lithia Motors
|
$359.98 | $397.40 | $9.6B | 12.29x | $0.53 | 0.58% | 0.28x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings
|
96.01% | 3.805 | 222.85% | 0.15x |
|
CMOT
Curtiss Motorcycles
|
-- | 2.183 | -- | -- |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
58.05% | 2.151 | 237.58% | 4.25x |
|
GORV
Lazydays Holdings
|
76.64% | 0.831 | 513.46% | 0.11x |
|
HZO
MarineMax
|
52.96% | 5.261 | 136.38% | 0.31x |
|
LAD
Lithia Motors
|
67.01% | 2.105 | 157.51% | 0.24x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings
|
$498.5M | $63.7M | -0.8% | -12.2% | 3.73% | $304.6M |
|
CMOT
Curtiss Motorcycles
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$174.1M | $25.2M | -0.32% | -0.82% | 7.25% | -$23.6M |
|
GORV
Lazydays Holdings
|
$45.3M | -$5.7M | -28.91% | -95.45% | -2.87% | -$9.2M |
|
HZO
MarineMax
|
$193.2M | $26.8M | 1.88% | 4% | 4.76% | -$17.5M |
|
LAD
Lithia Motors
|
$1.4B | $382.3M | 4.35% | 12.55% | 5.21% | $157.1M |
Camping World Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or CMOT?
Curtiss Motorcycles has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of --. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat Curtiss Motorcycles's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings28.9% $0.09 $2.8B CMOTCurtiss Motorcycles-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or CMOT?
Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand Curtiss Motorcycles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Camping World Holdings has higher upside potential than Curtiss Motorcycles, analysts believe Camping World Holdings is more attractive than Curtiss Motorcycles.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings0 0 0 CMOTCurtiss Motorcycles0 0 0 -
Is CWH or CMOT More Risky?
Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss Motorcycles has a beta of -7.238, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 823.773%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or CMOT?
Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Curtiss Motorcycles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss Motorcycles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or CMOT?
Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Curtiss Motorcycles quarterly revenues of --. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than Curtiss Motorcycles's net income of --. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Curtiss Motorcycles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.39x for Curtiss Motorcycles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings0.27x -- $1.7B $5.5M CMOTCurtiss Motorcycles0.39x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or CRMT?
America's Car-Mart has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of 1.47%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat America's Car-Mart's return on equity of -0.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings28.9% $0.09 $2.8B CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart50.12% $0.61 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or CRMT?
Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand America's Car-Mart has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -5.02%. Given that Camping World Holdings has higher upside potential than America's Car-Mart, analysts believe Camping World Holdings is more attractive than America's Car-Mart.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings0 0 0 CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart0 3 0 -
Is CWH or CRMT More Risky?
Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison America's Car-Mart has a beta of 1.679, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or CRMT?
Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. America's Car-Mart offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. America's Car-Mart pays out -0.13% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or CRMT?
Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than America's Car-Mart quarterly revenues of $347.3M. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than America's Car-Mart's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while America's Car-Mart's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.27x for America's Car-Mart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings0.27x -- $1.7B $5.5M CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart0.27x -- $347.3M $5.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or GORV?
Lazydays Holdings has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of -8.28%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat Lazydays Holdings's return on equity of -95.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings28.9% $0.09 $2.8B GORVLazydays Holdings21.23% -$1.37 $560.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or GORV?
Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand Lazydays Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1104.82%. Given that Lazydays Holdings has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, analysts believe Lazydays Holdings is more attractive than Camping World Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings0 0 0 GORVLazydays Holdings0 2 0 -
Is CWH or GORV More Risky?
Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazydays Holdings has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.132%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or GORV?
Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Lazydays Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazydays Holdings pays out -4.35% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or GORV?
Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Lazydays Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.5M. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than Lazydays Holdings's net income of -$17.7M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lazydays Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.01x for Lazydays Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings0.27x -- $1.7B $5.5M GORVLazydays Holdings0.01x -- $213.5M -$17.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or HZO?
MarineMax has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of 0.71%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat MarineMax's return on equity of 4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings28.9% $0.09 $2.8B HZOMarineMax34.31% $0.17 $2.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or HZO?
Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand MarineMax has an analysts' consensus of $39.63 which suggests that it could grow by 39.77%. Given that MarineMax has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, analysts believe MarineMax is more attractive than Camping World Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings0 0 0 HZOMarineMax8 2 0 -
Is CWH or HZO More Risky?
Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarineMax has a beta of 1.866, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.554%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or HZO?
Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. MarineMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. MarineMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or HZO?
Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than MarineMax quarterly revenues of $563.1M. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than MarineMax's net income of $4M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarineMax's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.27x for MarineMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings0.27x -- $1.7B $5.5M HZOMarineMax0.27x 17.18x $563.1M $4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or LAD?
Lithia Motors has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of 2.27%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings28.9% $0.09 $2.8B LADLithia Motors15.51% $7.80 $20B -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or LAD?
Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $397.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that Camping World Holdings has higher upside potential than Lithia Motors, analysts believe Camping World Holdings is more attractive than Lithia Motors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings0 0 0 LADLithia Motors8 4 0 -
Is CWH or LAD More Risky?
Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or LAD?
Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 5.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Camping World Holdings's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or LAD?
Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.1M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 12.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.28x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings0.27x -- $1.7B $5.5M LADLithia Motors0.28x 12.29x $9.2B $209.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 4.46% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 10.25% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.77% over the past day.
