CE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -0.51%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat Dow's return on equity of 5.97%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $64.16, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.41%. Given that Dow has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Dow is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.728% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.993%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Dow offers a yield of 7.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 176.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than Dow's net income of -$53M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Dow's PE ratio is 23.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.61x versus 0.59x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FMC has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -1.33%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat FMC's return on equity of 7.59%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $64.16, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand FMC has an analysts' consensus of $50.64 which suggests that it could grow by 21.99%. Given that FMC has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe FMC is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.728% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FMC has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.623%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. FMC offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. FMC pays out 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than FMC quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than FMC's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while FMC's PE ratio is 15.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.61x versus 1.23x for FMC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -9.41%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $64.16, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $11.11 which suggests that it could grow by 108.46%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.728% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.169%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.61x versus 0.14x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of 4.06%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $64.16, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $153.49 which suggests that it could grow by 25.8%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.728% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Nucor's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.61x versus 0.95x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.