CBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Cabot's net margin of -0.63%. Cabot's return on equity of 25.42% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Cabot has a consensus price target of $117.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cabot has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Cabot is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Cabot has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.069% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Cabot has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Cabot pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cabot quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Cabot's net income of $137M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Cabot's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabot is 1.24x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Cabot's net margin of --. Cabot's return on equity of 25.42% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Cabot has a consensus price target of $117.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Cabot, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Cabot.

Cabot has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.069% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Cabot has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cabot pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cabot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cabot quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Cabot's net income of $137M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Cabot's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabot is 1.24x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Cabot's net margin of 7.32%. Cabot's return on equity of 25.42% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Cabot has a consensus price target of $117.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 17.24%. Given that Cabot has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cabot is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Cabot has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.069% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Cabot has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Cabot pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cabot quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Cabot's net income of $137M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Cabot's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabot is 1.24x versus 1.05x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Cabot's net margin of --. Cabot's return on equity of 25.42% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Cabot has a consensus price target of $117.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Cabot, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Cabot.

Cabot has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.069% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Cabot has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cabot pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cabot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cabot quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Cabot's net income of $137M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Cabot's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabot is 1.24x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.