CBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 8.1%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $10.68 which suggests that it could grow by 24.31%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Global Medical REIT, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Global Medical REIT.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.028%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 9.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Medical REIT's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $35M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is higher than Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 859.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.64x versus 4.09x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Getty Realty has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 42.05%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 7.43%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $33.43 which suggests that it could grow by 9.39%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Getty Realty.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.153%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 141.01% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Getty Realty's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $53M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is higher than Getty Realty's net income of $22.3M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.64x versus 8.20x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 31.6%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $24.74 which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.919%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are smaller than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $525.4M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is lower than Kimco Realty's net income of $166M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 38.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.64x versus 7.08x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 4.81%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.01%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 16.94%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 20.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.64x versus 0.72x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.