BTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 1.48%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -7.06%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $29.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.63%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.41%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Hallador Energy, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Hallador Energy.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.458%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $105M. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 8.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.66x versus 1.00x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 25.36%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of -4.51%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $29.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.63%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.01%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than NACCO Industries, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than NACCO Industries.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.216%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out -16.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $15.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.66x versus 0.95x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 73.91%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $29.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.63%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -85.73%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.22%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $52.2M. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is higher than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.66x versus 5.70x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 9.81%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $29.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.63%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.31%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 5.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.004%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.66x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.