BEPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy has a net margin of -64.75% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of 18.32%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of -7.96% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity of 24.01%.

Brookfield Renewable has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.11%. On the other hand Constellation Energy has an analysts' consensus of $279.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.58%. Given that Brookfield Renewable has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Brookfield Renewable is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brookfield Renewable has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Constellation Energy offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Brookfield Renewable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brookfield Renewable quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Constellation Energy quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Brookfield Renewable's net income of -$674M is lower than Constellation Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Brookfield Renewable's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Constellation Energy's PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Renewable is 1.15x versus 4.04x for Constellation Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluence Energy has a net margin of -64.75% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of 3.9%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of -7.96% beat Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1%.

Brookfield Renewable has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.11%. On the other hand Fluence Energy has an analysts' consensus of $26.92 which suggests that it could grow by 67.31%. Given that Fluence Energy has higher upside potential than Brookfield Renewable, analysts believe Fluence Energy is more attractive than Brookfield Renewable.

Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brookfield Renewable has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Fluence Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brookfield Renewable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluence Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brookfield Renewable quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Fluence Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Brookfield Renewable's net income of -$674M is lower than Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M. Notably, Brookfield Renewable's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Fluence Energy's PE ratio is 119.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Renewable is 1.15x versus 0.84x for Fluence Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -64.75% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of 30.27%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of -7.96% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Brookfield Renewable has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.11%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $255.56 which suggests that it could grow by 15.22%. Given that Brookfield Renewable has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Brookfield Renewable is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brookfield Renewable has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brookfield Renewable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brookfield Renewable quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Brookfield Renewable's net income of -$674M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Brookfield Renewable's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Renewable is 1.15x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of -64.75% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of --. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of -7.96% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Brookfield Renewable has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.11%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brookfield Renewable has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Brookfield Renewable is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brookfield Renewable has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brookfield Renewable pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brookfield Renewable quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Brookfield Renewable's net income of -$674M is lower than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$777.7K. Notably, Brookfield Renewable's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Renewable is 1.15x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.