BCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Imax has a net margin of -19.96% compared to BCE's net margin of 15.2%. BCE's return on equity of 1.36% beat Imax's return on equity of 6.67%.

BCE has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.42%. On the other hand Imax has an analysts' consensus of $27.27 which suggests that it could grow by 7.97%. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Imax, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Imax.

BCE has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imax has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.317%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.67%. Imax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 162.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Imax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Imax quarterly revenues of $91.5M. BCE's net income of -$873.5M is lower than Imax's net income of $13.9M. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 330.78x while Imax's PE ratio is 57.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.16x versus 3.94x for Imax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Karbon-X has a net margin of -19.96% compared to BCE's net margin of -464.99%. BCE's return on equity of 1.36% beat Karbon-X's return on equity of -125.45%.

BCE has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.42%. On the other hand Karbon-X has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Karbon-X, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Karbon-X.

BCE has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karbon-X has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.67%. Karbon-X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 162.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Karbon-X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Karbon-X quarterly revenues of $125K. BCE's net income of -$873.5M is lower than Karbon-X's net income of -$581.2K. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 330.78x while Karbon-X's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.16x versus 293.33x for Karbon-X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lions Gate Entertainment has a net margin of -19.96% compared to BCE's net margin of -17.22%. BCE's return on equity of 1.36% beat Lions Gate Entertainment's return on equity of -4775.91%.

BCE has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.42%. On the other hand Lions Gate Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.24%. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Lions Gate Entertainment, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Lions Gate Entertainment.

BCE has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lions Gate Entertainment has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.194%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.67%. Lions Gate Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 162.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Lions Gate Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Lions Gate Entertainment quarterly revenues of $948.6M. BCE's net income of -$873.5M is lower than Lions Gate Entertainment's net income of -$163.3M. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 330.78x while Lions Gate Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.16x versus 0.43x for Lions Gate Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lionsgate Studios has a net margin of -19.96% compared to BCE's net margin of -13.77%. BCE's return on equity of 1.36% beat Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of --.

BCE has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.42%. On the other hand Lionsgate Studios has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.2%. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Lionsgate Studios, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Lionsgate Studios.

BCE has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.67%. Lionsgate Studios offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 162.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Lionsgate Studios pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues of $823.7M. BCE's net income of -$873.5M is lower than Lionsgate Studios's net income of -$113.4M. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 330.78x while Lionsgate Studios's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.16x versus 0.71x for Lionsgate Studios. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.