AXS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 11.97%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 11.72% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $425.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.28%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.941%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 48.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $180.7M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $509M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.38x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 5.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.31x versus 0.97x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 40.78%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 11.72% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -68.9%. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.446%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 48.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $180.7M is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.38x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.31x versus 3.66x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of -402.57%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 11.72% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.781%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 48.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Axis Capital Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $180.7M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.38x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.31x versus 1.56x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 29.8%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 11.72% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $294.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.38%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.942, which suggesting that the stock is 5.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.003%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 48.91% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $4B. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $180.7M is lower than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.38x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 3.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.31x versus 1.02x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.