ATHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheer Holding has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of --. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat Cheer Holding's return on equity of 12.82%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand Cheer Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2806.98%. Given that Cheer Holding has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe Cheer Holding is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheer Holding has a beta of -0.333, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.299%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.43%. Cheer Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheer Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than Cheer Holding quarterly revenues of --. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than Cheer Holding's net income of --. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while Cheer Holding's PE ratio is 0.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.25x versus 0.16x for Cheer Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZW Data Action Technologies has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of -59.09%. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat ZW Data Action Technologies's return on equity of -81.18%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autohome has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, analysts believe Autohome is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.653%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.43%. ZW Data Action Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than ZW Data Action Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than ZW Data Action Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while ZW Data Action Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.25x versus 0.19x for ZW Data Action Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

36KR Holdings has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of --. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat 36KR Holdings's return on equity of -44.22%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand 36KR Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3854.07%. Given that 36KR Holdings has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe 36KR Holdings is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 36KR Holdings has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.105%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.43%. 36KR Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. 36KR Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than 36KR Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than 36KR Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while 36KR Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.25x versus 4.70x for 36KR Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WiMi Hologram Cloud has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of --. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat WiMi Hologram Cloud's return on equity of -44.29%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand WiMi Hologram Cloud has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 205.68%. Given that WiMi Hologram Cloud has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe WiMi Hologram Cloud is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WiMi Hologram Cloud has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.43%. WiMi Hologram Cloud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. WiMi Hologram Cloud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than WiMi Hologram Cloud quarterly revenues of --. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than WiMi Hologram Cloud's net income of --. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while WiMi Hologram Cloud's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.25x versus 2.51x for WiMi Hologram Cloud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.