ALTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Albemarle has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of -78.91%. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.03, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Albemarle has an analysts' consensus of $117.72 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Albemarle has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.83%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Albemarle offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle pays out 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are smaller than Albemarle quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Albemarle's PE ratio is 40.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 5.64x versus 1.61x for Albemarle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of 8.77%. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.03, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.14%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.576%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 5.64x versus 0.86x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 19.33%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.03, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 38.73%. Given that Rio Tinto PLC has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Rio Tinto PLC is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.849%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 64.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are larger than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 9.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 5.64x versus 1.79x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of 7.32%. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.03, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 5.64x versus 1.04x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.