PTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of -14.12%. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Alnylam Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of --.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 772.06%. On the other hand Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $304.87 which suggests that it could grow by 20.24%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Alnylam Pharmaceuticals.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.392, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.76%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are smaller than Alnylam Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $593.2M. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Alnylam Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$83.8M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alnylam Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 14.40x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blueprint Medicines has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of -34.13%. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Blueprint Medicines's return on equity of -24.43%.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 772.06%. On the other hand Blueprint Medicines has an analysts' consensus of $127.20 which suggests that it could grow by 40.58%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Blueprint Medicines, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Blueprint Medicines.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blueprint Medicines has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.472%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blueprint Medicines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blueprint Medicines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are smaller than Blueprint Medicines quarterly revenues of $146.4M. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Blueprint Medicines's net income of -$50M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blueprint Medicines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 11.28x for Blueprint Medicines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bruker has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of 1.4%. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Bruker's return on equity of 6.78%.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 772.06%. On the other hand Bruker has an analysts' consensus of $68.42 which suggests that it could grow by 46.56%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Bruker, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Bruker.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bruker has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.406%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bruker offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker pays out 26.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are smaller than Bruker quarterly revenues of $979.6M. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Bruker's net income of $13.7M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bruker's PE ratio is 61.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 2.07x for Bruker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organon & has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of 6.85%. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Organon &'s return on equity of 397.42%.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 772.06%. On the other hand Organon & has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.83%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Organon &, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Organon &.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organon & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organon & offers a yield of 7.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organon & pays out 34.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Organon &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are smaller than Organon & quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Organon &'s net income of $109M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organon &'s PE ratio is 4.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 0.64x for Organon &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.