DC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Resource has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of -79.08%. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gold Resource's return on equity of -54.81%.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.71%. On the other hand Gold Resource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 504.84%. Given that Gold Resource has higher upside potential than Dakota Gold, analysts believe Gold Resource is more attractive than Dakota Gold.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Resource has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.465%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Resource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Resource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Resource quarterly revenues of $13.3M. Dakota Gold's net income of -$10.1M is higher than Gold Resource's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Resource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 0.30x for Gold Resource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idaho Strategic Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of 32.57%. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Idaho Strategic Resources's return on equity of 26.06%.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.71%. On the other hand Idaho Strategic Resources has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.29%. Given that Dakota Gold has higher upside potential than Idaho Strategic Resources, analysts believe Dakota Gold is more attractive than Idaho Strategic Resources.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idaho Strategic Resources has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.101%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Idaho Strategic Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Idaho Strategic Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Idaho Strategic Resources quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Dakota Gold's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Idaho Strategic Resources's net income of $2M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Idaho Strategic Resources's PE ratio is 20.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 6.13x for Idaho Strategic Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comstock has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of -2690.24%. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Comstock's return on equity of -30.89%.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.71%. On the other hand Comstock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 641.62%. Given that Comstock has higher upside potential than Dakota Gold, analysts believe Comstock is more attractive than Dakota Gold.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock has a beta of 1.981, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.097%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comstock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Comstock quarterly revenues of $556.4K. Dakota Gold's net income of -$10.1M is higher than Comstock's net income of -$15M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comstock's PE ratio is 2.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 25.45x for Comstock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vista Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of --. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Vista Gold's return on equity of --.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.71%. On the other hand Vista Gold has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 378.93%. Given that Vista Gold has higher upside potential than Dakota Gold, analysts believe Vista Gold is more attractive than Dakota Gold.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vista Gold has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.304%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vista Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vista Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vista Gold quarterly revenues of --. Dakota Gold's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Vista Gold's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vista Gold's PE ratio is 6.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 159.82x for Vista Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.