AUST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of -124.64%. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.06%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.39 which suggests that it could grow by 174.22%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Austin Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Austin Gold.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Austin Gold's net income of -$948K is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus 23.17x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of -3.98%. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4%.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.06%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 84.66%. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than McEwen Mining, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than McEwen Mining.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.879%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Austin Gold's net income of -$948K is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus 1.97x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of --. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.06%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.165%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. Austin Gold's net income of -$948K is lower than Rise Gold's net income of -$628.4K. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of --. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.06%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 247.9%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Austin Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Austin Gold.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.701%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Austin Gold's net income of -$948K is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 263.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.